|
Taxing Exemptions II - By Tim Barkley |
Mr. and Mrs. Richards
continue their visit with their attorney, begun in the
September 16 edition of this fine publication. Their
estate of $1.0 million is presently exempt from Maryland
and federal estate tax, but they hope their estate will
grow as they continue to invest and the markets improve.
Their attorney has shared
with them that, if their estate is worth $1.5 million when the
second of them dies, the estate will be subject to Maryland
estate tax in the amount of $63,500.
"Nobody knows what Congress
will do about the federal estate tax," opines their attorney.
"The tax is due to expire in 2010, and be reinstated in 2011
with an exemption of $1.0 million, so under current law your
estate will also be subject to federal estate tax of $210,000,
so the total tax bill will reach nearly $275,000, or about
thirty percent of your estate."
"That's a lot of tax,"
interjects Mrs. Richards. "I thought President Obama was going
to raise the exemption or freeze it at $3.5 million or
something."
"That was the plan," their
attorney replies, "but nothing has been done yet and it's
mid-October. Congress is so fixated on the healthcare issue
that nobody's really moving forward on the estate tax.
"The Democrats seem to want
to freeze the exemption at present levels, but it looks like
the Republicans will wait until 2010 when the estate tax is
repealed, and then try to make the repeal permanent. The
Democrats don't want the estate tax to expire at all. The
Republicans are concerned that they don't have enough votes to
make the repeal of the estate tax permanent, and that the
Democrats will just wait until 2011 when the exemption drops.
"So the answer is that nobody
knows."
"You're not very helpful,"
complains Mr. Richards.
"Hey," their attorney
replies, "I'm just the messenger. If you don't like how this
is playing out, call your Congressman! What worries me is
either hasty legislation that causes more problems than it
fixes, or retroactive legislation passed sometime in 2010 that
undoes planning.
"The real question is whether
you want to plan to avoid an estate tax to which you're not
subject yet. Remember, you only have $1.0 million right now.
Maybe we should defer that discussion until Congress acts on
the estate tax.
"In the meantime, you have
your children to plan for, and you wanted to make sure the
dogs were cared for."
"That's right," nods Mrs.
Richards. "The kids are responsible enough that we're not
worried about them wasting their inheritance. We are worried
about the dogs, though. Our daughter-in-law and our daughter
simply can't abide the dogs. We're thinking about leaving them
to friends, along with some money for their care, but want to
be sure that the money goes for the dogs, and not someplace
else. We trust our friends, but . . ."
Their attorney agrees, "The
problem with people is that they're people, and even good
people can be tempted to do bad things.
"How about putting the money
in trust for the dogs. Under the new Maryland pet trust law
that went into effect October 1, the money in the trust may be
used only for your dogs' benefit, as long as it's a reasonable
amount, so your friends can't just use the money to take a
nice vacation. You can appoint an 'enforcer,' maybe your son,
to be sure the terms of the trust are carried out. When the
dogs have died, left-over money can be given to a charity,
maybe an animal rescue.
"We can put this in your
will, so it's part of your estate plan. The pet trust should
provide instruction on diet and exercise, medical care and
permissible euthanasia, burial or cremation and disposition of
remains and other things that are important to you. Because
your dogs might need care during your lifetime, such as during
a period of incapacity, pet trust provisions should be
included, not just in your will, but also in your Durable
Power of Attorney. I have a form on my website,
www.barkleylaw.com/barkleylaw_pettrustchecklist.pdf,
that might be helpful."
"That's a lot to think
about," comments Mrs. Richards. "Let us mull over this and
we'll get back to you. Can we get together in a few weeks?"
"Certainly," affirms their
attorney, standing up and shaking their hands, "let's go ahead
and schedule our next meeting for mid-November!" |